![]() If hypothetically there had been hardware that could directly load and interprete the HAL, it would have been regarded as firmware.Ībout your privacy concerns, it does not matter on which of the many processors in your computer the proprietary software runs - if it sees your unencrypted data, then it can perform whatever function was implemented and hidden there.Ībout the security of your system, a malicious PCIe device can DMA over your memory, initiate P2P transfers, and cause other problems. Here is an example which blurred the lines between driver and firmware: Some people here may remember the Madwifi driver with the Atheros HAL, essentially a open-source wrapper that could load a binary blob and execute it, performing firmware-like functions. Actually, the differences are not as clear as some people think.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |